Favorite Links:
http://www.deceptiondollar.com/
www.blackboxvoting.com
http://www.newsgarden.org/columns/dugger.shtml
http://www.govsux.com/penta-lawn.htm
http://www.standdown.net/index.htm
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/jpdesm/pentagon/english.html
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/jpdesm/pentagon/investigation77.htm
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa11.htm
http://thebird.org/host/dcdave/article3/991228.html
http://www.thedoctorwithin.com/articles/doors_of_perception.html
http://www.blackcommentator.com/38/38_cover_pr.html
http://www.realsightings.com/favorite_links.htm
http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/
Favorite Science:
RICHARD L. FRANKLIN
- Re Emily Dickinson and the murky lines between sanity and madness: In 1899,
Bernard Hart published a book entitled "The Psychology of Insanity." Hart was
puzzled over the question of what makes one person "sane" and another person
"insane." He interviewed many people in asylums who had delusions about their
identity. He found that if a person believed he were Napoleon, no amount of
evidence would ever convince him otherwise. He would always discount the
evidence as false, fabricated by enemies, and so forth. Hart began to wonder
whether "sane" people ever adopted and held beliefs in the same manner. After
interviewing countless "sane" people, namely those who are allowed to live
outside insane asylums, he concluded that nearly all of them adopted and held
on to political or religious beliefs in exactly the same manner. No amount of
evidence or logic would ever convince them to drop those beliefs. Hart
concluded that society often arbitrarily determines which sets of beliefs mark
one as insane and which beliefs are accepted as sane. If one holds onto a
belief about one's identity that is totally belied by logic and evidence, he
is thereby insane; however, if one holds a religious or political belief that
is completely refuted by logic and evidence, he is not the least bit crazy.